Am Tue, 09. Nov 2010 um 11:57:29 +0100 schrieb torbenh: Torben, > On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 12:49:46PM +1100, Leigh Dyer wrote: > > Awesome! [...] > i dont see the transport synchronisation working with a jack1 svn version. > you are still using only a sync callback. your posting is confusing. Most probably Leigh is not acountable for your complains and I am not sure they are addressed to me, but I will give a comment anyway. First _I_ will surely not use "sync callback", in best case seq24 will. > and you are relying on the transport to go through the > JackTransportStarting state. Second _I_ do not rely on transport via software. > this issue should be fixed. > iirc we came to the conclusion, that seq24 is broken, and we will not > revert the changes in jack, which break it. Pardon, who is "we"? I can not recall such kind of agreement and I certainly do not know anything about changes going on in jack svn. [...] > the patch for jack-session support didnt get merged either. I was not aware of this patch, searching the devel mailing list history today I found your patch dating from March when I was busy doing other things. I recommend to verify a little bit earlyer wheather your contributions get in or not and to attrack attention about important changes. Guido PS: Please do _not_ CC me for "list replys", this is annoying -- http://www.bayernline.de/~gscholz/ http://www.lug-burghausen.org/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
