On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 8:31 PM, Gabriel M. Beddingfield <gabrbedd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Wed, 20 Oct 2010, allcoms wrote: > >> If not, why JACK2? > > AFAIK you still need Jack2 for: > > * SMP (parallel processing) > > * dbus / pulseaudio integration > > * better support for mis-behaving clients (does > not disconnect the client, whereas Jack1 ejects > the client after the first hiccup. > > -gabriel > Points 2+3 are cool, but its the SMP I'd like some more info on. Say I have a quad core - how great a performance difference may I expect to see between running J1 vs J2 and in what exactly? Track count? Smaller latency? More plugins due to more DSP processing power? I'm presuming the last one would depend on the plugins SMP support as much as JACK. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
