Lovely to hear JACK1 is better than ever but I was told that JACK2 would support SMP better than JACK1. Would better SMP support in J2 lead to more efficient handling and processing wrt plugins ie LADSPA's or maybe even the ability to squeeze more tracks out of your hardware? If not, why JACK2? Thanks PD! On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 8:15 PM, Paul Davis <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 3:06 PM, allcoms <allcoms@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> . Please try this combo of apps >>> with JACK 1 SVN or JACK2 but I personally am more interested in JACK1 >>> as it is reportedly more stable and xrun-packed than JACK2. I haven't >>> actually done any real testing with JACK2 yet but that was the case >>> last I asked Torben about this and so I just took his word for it. >> >> That should've read 'less xrun-packed' of course. >> >> Has anyone done any testing wrt performance and stability of JACK1 vs >> JACK2 recently? Be nice is Paul or Torben could give us a brief >> update on this. > > neither torben nor myself use jack2. jack1 is more stable than ever. > are you expecting something? > _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
