Re: OT: 64 vs 32 bit?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 3:57 PM, Joel Roth <joelz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Although many say "64-bit is well established, no need
> to worry about compatibility", I've had a few run ins.
> At one point, I was maintaining two parallel Debian systems,
> one 32-bit and one 64-bit, to track down such issues.
>
> Some disadvantages to mixed systems, from the amd64 faq
> at http://alioth.debian.org/docman/view.php/30192/21/debian-amd64-howto.html

Great document, thanks for the pointer.

Unfortunately, this entry is what keeps biting me:

Is there no flash plugin for mozilla?

No. If you really need to access such webpages, install mozilla and
flashplugin-nonfree in your 386 chroot and use the 32bit browser to
access the sites.

I watch a lot of YouTube, and I've been missing Flash on my 64 bit
machine.  Thanks for suggesting the 32 bit chroot.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux