On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 09:51:07PM -0700, Patrick Shirkey wrote : > > On Fri, September 24, 2010 9:54 am, Folderol wrote: > > On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 00:35:22 -0700 > > Ken Restivo <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> I guess they're used to eye candy over there in closed software land. > >> Hell, I liked Jamin too until Fons hipped me to the fact that it's a > >> vocoder. > > > > > Just out of interest, when did this become a fact? > > IIRC Fons suggested the sc4 compressor algorithm was similar to a vocoder. > Apart from the multiband parametric, limiter and overall ui development > that are also part of the jamin experience, I have never heard anything > coming out of jamin that sounds remotely like a vocoder. > > I have also not heard of any other jack application that attempts to > provide a complete mastering tool chain. > > So, I'm not sure why jamin is now to be considered passe. > > Of course if someone else actually wrote something that was comparable in > functionality then I would be more than interested to hear the results. > > But until that time jamin still stands as the only tool in it's class that > I know of. I agree with you. -- Aurélien _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
