On 25 September 2010 05:51, Patrick Shirkey <pshirkey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, September 24, 2010 9:54 am, Folderol wrote: >> On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 00:35:22 -0700 >> Ken Restivo <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> I guess they're used to eye candy over there in closed software land. >>> Hell, I liked Jamin too until Fons hipped me to the fact that it's a >>> vocoder. >> > > > Just out of interest, when did this become a fact? > > IIRC Fons suggested the sc4 compressor algorithm was similar to a vocoder. > Apart from the multiband parametric, limiter and overall ui development > that are also part of the jamin experience, I have never heard anything > coming out of jamin that sounds remotely like a vocoder. > > I have also not heard of any other jack application that attempts to > provide a complete mastering tool chain. > > So, I'm not sure why jamin is now to be considered passe. > > Of course if someone else actually wrote something that was comparable in > functionality then I would be more than interested to hear the results. > > But until that time jamin still stands as the only tool in it's class that > I know of. > has development stopped because the devs just found other things they preferred to work on or were there good reasons to stop development of it? james. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
