On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 04:43:22PM -1000, Joel Roth wrote: > > Ecasound _is_ very lightweight. > > According to 'pmap', Ecasound consumes about 19MB on my system > at startup. > > If simple recording is all you need, Ecasound, or one of the > other alternatives mentioned is fine. > > If you want Ecasound with some added convenience features, > I'll put in a mention for Nama.[1] > > Starting up Nama consumes about 55MB of memory > in the text-only mode, and 75MB of memory in > the GUI+text mode. And ardour2 consumes 160MB of memory at startup. > Regards, > > Joel > > [1] http://freeshell.de/~bolangi/cgi1/nama.cgi/00home.html > -- Joel Roth _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user