On Saturday 13 March 2010 05:29:29 Atte André Jensen wrote: > Hi > > I don't understand the CC license at all. There is no cc license. This is one of the problems with how a lot of people speak about the issue. There are multiple cc licenses and the behave quite differently. Which did you have in mind? > I could dig through a jungle > starting with google, and I *have* read and understood the basics > regarding CC. I'm hoping for some personal experiences in plain > language. Here goes: Let's take cc BY-SA which is the closest one they have to the GPL and recast the questions in terms of computer code: > > 1) What's the advantages for the artist with CC compared to "All rights > reserved". 1) What's the advantages for the programmer with the GPL compared to "All rights reserved". > > 2) What's the disadvantages for the artist with CC compared to "All > rights reserved". 2) What's the disadvantages for the programmer with the GPL compared to "All rights reserved". > > 3) What's the advantages for the consumer with CC compared to "All > rights reserved". 3) What's the advantages for the consumer with the GPL compared to "All rights reserved". > > I assume there's no disadvantages for the customer with CC... I assume there's no disadvantages for the customer with the GPL. > > Thanks in advance for any input. You could perhaps do the same thing with cc BY and the BSD. I hope this may help with your thinking and with further questions. all the best, drew _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
