hollunder wrote: > Excerpts from Nick Dokos's message of 2010-02-17 02:13:41 +0100: >> Jack O'Quin <jack.oquin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 5:19 PM, james morris <james@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JACK_Audio_Connection_Kit >>> Just noticed that recently, myself. >>> >>> My guess is JACK probably *does* meet their notability standards, but >>> the article would need to contain references to outside web sites >>> mentioning JACK. Perhaps something like the open source award given >>> to Paul a few years back... >>> >>> http://articles.techrepublic.com.com/5100-10878_11-5136755.html >>> -- >>> joq >> I added a note (and the ref to the TechRepublic article) to the Wikipedia >> page. Thanks for pointing it out! >> >> Nick >> > > The list of software that works with jack is really short and quite > random. > > The mention of aRts seems to be a bit off to me, I see no real relation. > > The text in general could be improved, especially the part about the > rename of jackdmp to jack2 doesn't look very English to me... > > The stable release version there is the one of jack2. Afaik jack1 and > jack2 are quite different and jack2 doesn't really replace jack1. > Also jack2 is written in C++, so the note there is wrong. Well, jack2 replaced jack1 here and a pile of difficulties disappeared. ;-) > I'm sure there's lots of stuff that could be added, the notability > thing really is a joke.. Notability by the lights of someone who doesn't do Linux audio at all: "JACK? What's that? Never heard of it, can't possibly be notable." ;-) -- David gnome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx authenticity, honesty, community _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
