Hallo, lanas hat gesagt: // lanas wrote: > That's not it I think. Using a sequencer for that is like painting the > Mona Lisa by number. Tangerine Dream surely have used some sequencers > but a large part of their work resided in the capability to modify in > real time what sound like 'sequences' by turning knobs and plugging > wires as sounds were made. As such, it was really a performance, more > than we could think in general. So I think rather they were using > complex arpeggiators. Today we can listen to that and write it down in > a MIDI file, but that's not what I'm looking for. The modern equivalent to what you describe could be live coding in Pd, SuperCollider etc., e.g. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9zKzxqN5mUI or http://vimeo.com/5272693 Ciao -- Frank _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
