On Sun, 2009-12-27 at 15:08 +1100, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > Bearcat M. Sandor wrote: > > > Yesterday i asked for assistance figuring out how to get mpd + pulse > > audio upsampling to 24/192. The results are *fantastic* Bass is deeper > > and tighter, decay is longer and vocals are clearer. I don't know why. > > It kinda makes sense and it doesn't. It might all be in my head. > > My guess is the latter. > > To see if you can tell the difference between the original source at a > sample rate supported by the hardware and the upsampled source, I > suggest you do proper double blind testing: > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blind_experiment#Double-blind_trials > > document what you find and then get someone else to repeat your double > blind test to see if your results can be repeated. > > The above is science, anything less is snake oil. > > I continue to be completely *embarassed* by some of the things I see > people write about sample rate conversion in general and about Secret > Rabbit Code in particular. Personally I won't beleive a word of it > until someone publishes proper test results that have been independently > verified. > > Erik I respect that opinon. However, this does allow me to play my 24/192 files as they were intended. I since the upsampling is a must, how can i get flash and gstreamer to upsample to 24/192 as well? -- Bearcat M. Şandor Cell: 406.210.3500 Jabber/xmpp/gtalk/email: bearcat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx MSN: bearcatsandor@xxxxxxxxxxx Yahoo: bearcatsandor AIM: bearcatmsandor _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
