Brent Busby wrote: > On Tue, 22 Dec 2009, sonofzev@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > >> TMany that use MusE regularly are more concerned about jackmidi and >> other features that bring new functionality or interoperability. From >> my understanding QT4 is more of a cosmetic update and wouldn't >> necessarily bring more sequencer functionality in. (correct me if I'm >> wrong) However migrating could require a major overhaul.... >> >> Robert and Tim have put in a hell of a lot of work in the past year or >> so and MusE is functioning really really well. It may look a bit >> dated.. but that's really not the point is it? > > Actually, I'm kind of dreading KDE/QT 4, because nothing I've seen or > heard of it has impressed me. As for looking dated, these days, usually > that seems to be defined by most people as not looking like a recent > version of Windows, which also isn't something I really aspire to with > my desktop anyway. > > I think I'd agree with everything you've said -- if MusE (or any app) > decided to stay on QT3 for longer, it wouldn't break my heart at all! A friend of mine who is busy trying to push me into using KDE4 says "It has more eye candy than Windows!" as if that is something wonderful! I also understand that Qt4 is supposed to be completely cross-platform now, so KDE will be able to run KDE4 on Windows. -- David gnome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx authenticity, honesty, community _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
