On Tue, 22 Dec 2009, sonofzev@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > TMany that use MusE regularly are more concerned about jackmidi and > other features that bring new functionality or interoperability. From > my understanding QT4 is more of a cosmetic update and wouldn't > necessarily bring more sequencer functionality in. (correct me if I'm > wrong) However migrating could require a major overhaul.... > > Robert and Tim have put in a hell of a lot of work in the past year or > so and MusE is functioning really really well. It may look a bit > dated.. but that's really not the point is it? Actually, I'm kind of dreading KDE/QT 4, because nothing I've seen or heard of it has impressed me. As for looking dated, these days, usually that seems to be defined by most people as not looking like a recent version of Windows, which also isn't something I really aspire to with my desktop anyway. I think I'd agree with everything you've said -- if MusE (or any app) decided to stay on QT3 for longer, it wouldn't break my heart at all! -- + Brent A. Busby + "We've all heard that a million monkeys + UNIX Systems Admin + banging on a million typewriters will + University of Chicago + eventually reproduce the entire works of + Physical Sciences Div. + Shakespeare. Now, thanks to the Internet, + James Franck Institute + we know this is not true." -Robert Wilensky _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
