On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 12:33 +0100, Martin Horn wrote: > On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 9:36 AM, Atte André Jensen > <atte.jensen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Martin Horn wrote: > > I made an install of ubuntustudio 8.04.3 hardy > > > I don't know much about ubuntustudio, but do you really think > it's a good idea to run software that's over 1 1/2 years old? > > In my experience, eventually you'll need to compile somethings > that needs a newer lib, and you're stuck... > > I chose this version because it is recommended by Ubuntustudio for > production critical machines and I know that I got all libs I need (in > fact I want to run only a single app - xwax). > > But as I am not able to manipulate irq priorities in the standard > kernel of ubuntustudio I will have to build a rt-kernel myself anyway, > so I'll maybe choose another more lightweight distro... > > ANY IDEAS which one is up to date but lightweight as it is for a 1Ghz > Pentium and I need realtime 4in/4out setup? > > Thanks to you all! Up-to-date + lightweight = Arch Linux! Be prepared to spend more time than usual to set up though, since there's not much hand-holding in the install process. Once you've set it up to your liking its easier than the alternatives (for me, personally). Oh, and its just about as close to bleeding-edge as you can get without using svn/cvs/git all the time, so be alert to what's being updated at any one time. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
