On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 9:36 AM, Atte André Jensen <atte.jensen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I chose this version because it is recommended by Ubuntustudio for production critical machines and I know that I got all libs I need (in fact I want to run only a single app - xwax).
But as I am not able to manipulate irq priorities in the standard kernel of ubuntustudio I will have to build a rt-kernel myself anyway, so I'll maybe choose another more lightweight distro...
ANY IDEAS which one is up to date but lightweight as it is for a 1Ghz Pentium and I need realtime 4in/4out setup?
Thanks to you all!
Martin Horn wrote:I don't know much about ubuntustudio, but do you really think it's a good idea to run software that's over 1 1/2 years old?
I made an install of ubuntustudio 8.04.3 hardy
In my experience, eventually you'll need to compile somethings that needs a newer lib, and you're stuck...
I chose this version because it is recommended by Ubuntustudio for production critical machines and I know that I got all libs I need (in fact I want to run only a single app - xwax).
But as I am not able to manipulate irq priorities in the standard kernel of ubuntustudio I will have to build a rt-kernel myself anyway, so I'll maybe choose another more lightweight distro...
ANY IDEAS which one is up to date but lightweight as it is for a 1Ghz Pentium and I need realtime 4in/4out setup?
Thanks to you all!
--
Atte
http://atte.dk http://modlys.dk
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
