Re: ubuntu 9.10 RT and Jack

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



i see..... well, then i guess i have to question my memlock or nice settings again, dont I?

I've tried the standard settings, nice @ -19 and then up to 19, memlock at 100%, rt prio at 99.  Memlock to 50%, to 65%. I haven't screwed around with rtprio much, though......

My question now, would be: what are these settings actually doing? memlock seems to speak for itself, how much available mem is set for audio purposes...right?

 but I dont see the difference between rtprio and nice, I only know that they handle interrupt priority in an indirect way. perhaps i've been setting them incorrectly; for nice and rtprio, the lowest number = highest priority?

Otherwise, I just don't see why each time i changed the settings, i would get no difference. It makes sense that my cpu would be constantly running at 60% if I were to set memlock to 50 or 60%, but the xrun count was always rediculous. and yes, tried restarts each time, for the jack server, and my computer itself.

Guess I'm looking for some good guidelines to follow while tweaking this stuff, too. Like what settings might be good for an amd x2 using 2gb ram?

thanks for the help

On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 4:37 PM, Hartmut Noack <zettberlin@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Gary Morgan schrieb:

>
> This is after tweaking memlocks, nice %s , buffers and so on.
>
> I know that chipset sound, is not a very efficient recording interface, but
> it seems there is more going on, besides that.
>
> I have two main questions here (they sum up to: how much of this is the
> chipset?)
> a. i had heard here and there in forums that the RT kernel in 9.04 and on
> was 'broken'. is that true?

9.4 was broken 9.10 works very good for me...

> b. Is RT only worth using for higher end machines with more ram and separate
> sound cards?

no -  the opposite is true: with a proper rt-kernel you can run critical
 stuff on lower machines also. It just grabs everything your box can do
for audio...


> And one more: Would anyone recommend using a different audio OS for this
> situation, like 64 studio?

Not really, wait until it is stable I would suggest...
If you want to try something debianish go for pure:dyne or AVLinux.

>(i might have mentioned jacklab, but it seems
> that project has been killed)

Not so much killed but died more or less without big shock and awe...
Still OpenSuse is very good for audio with the rt-kernel from jengelh
installed...

best regs

HZN
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAksB1DMACgkQ1Aecwva1SWNvpgCeMtKpL1JZBCgtQxgdYSOoD2Nd
PgcAoIezwBpz2kK4B5OXMP2cGOelPpmz
=PJFS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux