-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Gary Morgan schrieb: > > This is after tweaking memlocks, nice %s , buffers and so on. > > I know that chipset sound, is not a very efficient recording interface, but > it seems there is more going on, besides that. > > I have two main questions here (they sum up to: how much of this is the > chipset?) > a. i had heard here and there in forums that the RT kernel in 9.04 and on > was 'broken'. is that true? 9.4 was broken 9.10 works very good for me... > b. Is RT only worth using for higher end machines with more ram and separate > sound cards? no - the opposite is true: with a proper rt-kernel you can run critical stuff on lower machines also. It just grabs everything your box can do for audio... > And one more: Would anyone recommend using a different audio OS for this > situation, like 64 studio? Not really, wait until it is stable I would suggest... If you want to try something debianish go for pure:dyne or AVLinux. >(i might have mentioned jacklab, but it seems > that project has been killed) Not so much killed but died more or less without big shock and awe... Still OpenSuse is very good for audio with the rt-kernel from jengelh installed... best regs HZN -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAksB1DMACgkQ1Aecwva1SWNvpgCeMtKpL1JZBCgtQxgdYSOoD2Nd PgcAoIezwBpz2kK4B5OXMP2cGOelPpmz =PJFS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
