Hi, On Thursday 12 November 2009 09:47:59 Jorge Salgueiro wrote: > Top post is a question of accesibility to the blind. They shouldn't have to > listen to 30 posts every time they want to contribute. > So if you don't what no linux Stevie wonder to post in this list is your > decision. But I don't agree with it. But today's mail-clients are capable of detecting citations (by that nice >- quotation markers in front of the line) and can fold these parts or format to a smaller font-size. Why can't (screen-)readers detect and skip them? I concur that is is a hassle if 30-mails are quoted. But the normal and generally accepted behaviour is to answer below and only quote the relevant parts[*]. And to use quotation-markers. Nothing worse then an outlook-user answering directly inside your text without quotation-markers... But if its better accessible for you, we can all switch to text above, full- quote below and html :-) Have fun, Arnold [*] Of course this implies that you have actually read at least the parts you quote...
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
