On Thursday 29 October 2009 17:04:09 Nedko Arnaudov wrote: > Arnold Krille <arnold@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > Turns out that despite all config-file hackery this needs a custom > > patched dbus server to work. The patch is less then 10 lines but the > > mainline refuses to include it afaik. Which makes the whole anonymous > > authorization in dbus useless. > I've heard that the anonymous stuff is in git and will be released in > 1.4. OTOH if I was using such thing, I'd want ssh tunelling. I havent > tried ssh tunelled dbus, but it looks someone else did: > http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/Remote_DBus My use-case is a trusted network of machines running self-configuring jobs (using avahi/zeroconf for the self-configuring). With head- and disk-less machines. No ssh needed nor wanted. Just plain anonymous dbus... But that is a thing of the past. I have now my own text-based network-protocol that is usable for machine-to-machine- and human-to-machine-communication. Have fun, Arnold
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
