Arnold Krille <arnold@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Hi, > > On Thursday 29 October 2009 16:37:31 Nedko Arnaudov wrote: >> <flame> >> if qjackctl is not requriement, one can do it by accessing session buses >> (D-Bus) of multiple machines through network. >> /me runs back to the rebel camp :D >> </flame> > > Ever tried that??? I did. And as I didn't want a solution involving copying > changing(!) security secrets across machines, I wanted anonymous access to > dedicated dbus sessions. Not yet, I dont have multiple Linux machines, I have one. > Turns out that despite all config-file hackery this needs a custom patched dbus > server to work. The patch is less then 10 lines but the mainline refuses to > include it afaik. Which makes the whole anonymous authorization in dbus > useless. I've heard that the anonymous stuff is in git and will be released in 1.4. OTOH if I was using such thing, I'd want ssh tunelling. I havent tried ssh tunelled dbus, but it looks someone else did: http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/Remote_DBus -- Nedko Arnaudov <GnuPG KeyID: DE1716B0>
Attachment:
pgpZvpPHRLo7i.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
