fons@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > The dynamic behaviour of jkmeters (and also of the VU and > PPM meters in jmeters) is very strictly defined. The values > that are displayed are calculated in a way that does not > depend on the display update rate, and (within reasonable > limits) also not on the Jack period size. A level meter > would just be useless eye-candy otherwise. [...] > Ah, thank you - very illuminating (and reassuring) answers. You certainly see meters around (in consumer hardware, as well as software) that you just know are really nothing but eye-candy! ;) The VU meter is I think another interesting example of the cheap-and-easy in the analog domain being quite different from the cheap-and-easy in digital. I've personally never used a hardware VU meter in recording, so to me, DPMs seem like the traditional meter type, and the averaging ones are the new-fangled ones. :) As for meter refresh rates, I always appreciate a user setting for this - though theoretically I guess you could do things like determining the display hardware's refresh rate and varying the refresh rate depending on reserve CPU capacity. Thanks again, Chris _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
