Brett McCoy wrote: > On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 6:02 AM, Fons Adriaensen <fons@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> 1. To create a 'natural' sound, i.e. one that includes >> the acoustics of a real space, or something that could >> be a real space. In most cases, if the 'real space' is >> not something special such as a church, the listener >> would not really be aware of the reverb and certainly >> not hear it as an effect. It would just add realism, >> provide a idea of the dimensions of the space, and >> create depth - some instruments being closer than others. >> This is what you would do for classical music and in >> general for anything called 'acoustic'. In that case, >> if you start with dry recordings, you would add reverb >> on *all* instruments and voices, but not the same amount >> on all. > > I tried out jconv last night, on some recordings of my wife playing > flute, using the aux send method (since I hadf multiple tracks). It > sounded *awesome*, very lush and added some real depth to the > recordings. It's exactly what I need for choral and orchestral music. yeah, jconv is the best-sounding convolver in the world. the clarity of its fft, the warmth of the multiplications, and the effortless fulminance of the inverse fft add a lustre to strings and percussions, and the tightness of the fundamentals is in a league of its own. ever since i had my cpu socket gold-plated, i've been able to appreciate it in full. >;-> (sorry, i'm bored today. NOI. obviously, it's the sound of the IRs you are describing...) _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
