Arnold Krille wrote: > On Thursday 24 September 2009 19:45:20 david wrote: >> David Baron wrote: >>> rosegarden also does scoring. I found it nearly impossible to use for >>> this. It is one of the most complete DAW programs in linux but is now >>> dated, stuck with KDE3, could not run on KDE4. Being converted to QT4? >> Yes. Although some of us do not necessarily consider QT4 a good thing. > > Yeah, its a pity Qt isn't ported to that Emacs-OS-thing... > > Seriously, its just a tool-set. It doesn't matter which brand of hammer you > use, if you get the nail to hold the picture, all is fine. Don't dismiss the > craftsmen for using the tools he uses. > > Some people like the fact that Qt is usable on a lot of platforms without > changing a single line of code. Some people like the fact that it integrates > perfectly into the host-OS gui-wise. And some people like the fact that while > they are free to write open-source with Qt, they can also buy professional > support from the manufacturer. Oh, I'm not complaining about QT in general. I'm complaining about QT4 and the "forced migration" it appears to be doing to everyone. To wit, a lot of good enhancements and bug fixing in Rosegarden is on extended hold until the devs finish slogging through porting it to QT4. I guess I think there should have been much more "backwards compatibility" in QT4 ... Now don't get me started about the waste of time/resources known as KDE4! ;-) -- David gnome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx authenticity, honesty, community _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
