On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 06:30:50PM +0200, Carlo Capocasa wrote: > Hi Dave! > > I have a dual core laptop and using Jack2 has brought an increase in > performance. I use compiled Jack2 and Jack apps from the packaging system. > > Carlo > > Dave Phillips wrote: > > Greetings, > > > > 64 Studio 2.1 is a wonderfully stable and reliable system, one I've used > > profitably for quite a long time now. Alas, it's definitely out-of-date, > > and its version of JACK is the lamentable 0.109.2, and it's causing some > > problems with AVSynthesis that I'd like to finally resolve by upgrading > > JACK. > > > > I have 64 Studio 3.0 beta on my laptop, but I don't plan to upgrade the > > production machine until 3.0 reaches a stable public release. Meanwhile > > I'll be pleased if I can safely upgrade some of its components. > > > > Here's the question: I've successfully compiled JACK 0.116.2 and JACK2 > > 1.9.3, so in the opinions of my fellow LAUyers, which is the better > > choice for this system ? If I move to JACK2 will I need to recompile my > > JACK-savvy apps ? (That's not usually a problem.) Does anyone know if jack2 is being packaged yet for any .deb distros? -Eric Rz. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
