Hi Dave! I have a dual core laptop and using Jack2 has brought an increase in performance. I use compiled Jack2 and Jack apps from the packaging system. Carlo Dave Phillips wrote: > Greetings, > > 64 Studio 2.1 is a wonderfully stable and reliable system, one I've used > profitably for quite a long time now. Alas, it's definitely out-of-date, > and its version of JACK is the lamentable 0.109.2, and it's causing some > problems with AVSynthesis that I'd like to finally resolve by upgrading > JACK. > > I have 64 Studio 3.0 beta on my laptop, but I don't plan to upgrade the > production machine until 3.0 reaches a stable public release. Meanwhile > I'll be pleased if I can safely upgrade some of its components. > > Here's the question: I've successfully compiled JACK 0.116.2 and JACK2 > 1.9.3, so in the opinions of my fellow LAUyers, which is the better > choice for this system ? If I move to JACK2 will I need to recompile my > JACK-savvy apps ? (That's not usually a problem.) > > I await the dawn. :) > > Best, > > dp _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
