Grammostola Rosea wrote: > Atte Andre Jensen wrote: > >> Grammostola Rosea wrote: >> >> >> >>> In my search to an environment I got the feeling that SuperCollider is a >>> more modern language, a language for the future so to say. >>> >>> >> I tend to agree. However don't dismiss either pd or csound too early. >> They are both very powerful pieces of software, that let's you do very, >> very deep stuff. Each has it's advantages (enough for many a flame war), >> granted, but still, all are very powerful. >> >> >> >>> It's better >>> suitable to compete those VST plugins maybe... >>> I can see that is seems to be more easy to make a PD gui, but this >>> should be possible with SC too right? Don't know if the language is >>> ready for that yet. >>> >>> >> May I ask if you checked out any of the grand three and the baby one >> (csound, pd, super collider and chuck)? >> >> If not, I have to repeat the almost generic advise often given here: Get >> your feet a little bit wet with each (do a tutorial, for instance) to >> get a quick overview of what they can do and how they feel. >> >> Then pick one, stick wíth it, work with it, live with it, create music >> in it. Even if you later find you should switch, you'll have a much >> better idea what you need what you don't need, and it's not that much >> trouble to learn the next one. >> >> > Thanks for the advices. I tried pd a bit and SC. I think I like to work > with SC more, but I have to say, I'm just in the beginning of the process. > >> >> >>> Please post also a message to the SC mailinglist, then you get a more >>> general/objective view... >>> I found this: http://supercollider.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/Systems_interfacing_with_SC#other_systems Also some possibilities with faust.. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
