Atte Andre Jensen wrote: > Grammostola Rosea wrote: > > >> In my search to an environment I got the feeling that SuperCollider is a >> more modern language, a language for the future so to say. >> > > I tend to agree. However don't dismiss either pd or csound too early. > They are both very powerful pieces of software, that let's you do very, > very deep stuff. Each has it's advantages (enough for many a flame war), > granted, but still, all are very powerful. > > >> It's better >> suitable to compete those VST plugins maybe... >> I can see that is seems to be more easy to make a PD gui, but this >> should be possible with SC too right? Don't know if the language is >> ready for that yet. >> > > May I ask if you checked out any of the grand three and the baby one > (csound, pd, super collider and chuck)? > > If not, I have to repeat the almost generic advise often given here: Get > your feet a little bit wet with each (do a tutorial, for instance) to > get a quick overview of what they can do and how they feel. > > Then pick one, stick wíth it, work with it, live with it, create music > in it. Even if you later find you should switch, you'll have a much > better idea what you need what you don't need, and it's not that much > trouble to learn the next one. > Thanks for the advices. I tried pd a bit and SC. I think I like to work with SC more, but I have to say, I'm just in the beginning of the process. > >> Please post also a message to the SC mailinglist, then you get a more >> general/objective view... >> > > Done. > > Thanks, let's wait and see. \r _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
