On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 01:04:11AM +0300, cunnilinux himself wrote: > > I'm looking at this same question myself, but with one additional > > constraint: Support on the Mac OSX platform - I frequently share my projects > > with a collaborator who has one. A quick search turned up several people > > who are just *beginning* to develop ext4 support for OSX. > > so, there are three options for you: > (1) ext3 support implemented for mac os x > (2) hfs+ support implemented for linux > (3) ntfs-3g implemented for both (and windoze, naturally) > /* there is also fat, but it's not a filesystem at all :-D */ I've recently had difficulties with hfs+. I used the debian package hfsprogs, including fsck.hfsplus to manage an external hfs+ formatted USB drive. The drive would often get shut down in a "dirty" state, limiting me to read-only access. fsck.hfsplus -p would reset the "dirty" flag when it worked, but it worked only intermittently. More often the process would hang without releasing the device. This is with a recent kernel and bleeding-edge (sid, unstable) debian distribution. I wouldn't be concerned about speed so much as being interoperable. > seems like you want the fastest option. unfortunately, i don't know which one. > > -- > sex, bike, open source! -- Joel Roth _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
