Jesse Chappell wrote: > On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 3:06 PM, Gabriel M. > Beddingfield<gabriel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >>> GUI do you think would help the sooperlooper experience? FW's gui is >>> very much tied to that app, regarding the waveform updating, etc. >>> >> What's nice is that, out of the box, there's about 16 loops that I can have >> laid out in front of me, visually, to trigger or record or whatever. For >> someone just in to looping... FW gives a nice and fairly intuitive GUI. No >> sync options, a MIDI implementation out of the box, etc. >> > > Let me first say that I really like FW's approach to multiple > simultaneous loops. In many ways I wish SL had a different design > than it ended up with. Not needing to care a priori about the loop > count is really nice. > > As for a MIDI implementation out of the box... doesn't that just put > the burden of configuring your hardware to match it? I find that > setting/changing the bindings in SL (especially with midi learn) to be > a bit easier. I could easily include a selection of default midi > binding presets with SL, if I thought there was some common setup that > would actually be useful to people. Feel free to send me some! > Does sooperlooper supports a dance pad like fweelin does? \r _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
