On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 10:25:49AM -0600, Ernie Dulanowsky wrote: > What about using separate envelope follower and filter plugins to make your > own auto-wah ? > > cheers, > ernie > > On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 8:24 PM, Ken Restivo <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > For several years I've lusted away over the Clavinet-through-Auto-Wah > > sound: the Stevie Wonder sound (also used notably by Herbie Hancock, > > Medeski, Martin and Wood, and others). > > > > The problem is that either the LADSPA auto-wah plugin doesn't quite cut it, > > or the Clav soundfont I found on Hammersound several years ago doesn't have > > enough dynamic range to really make the thing "wah" in any noticeable way. > > > > Am I doing something wrong here, or is the plugin not quite the best > > implementation, and if so, are there any better ones? Likewise with Clavinet > > soundfonts too. > > Hmm, thanks. Well after digging into it a bit, it seems as though a proper "wah" effect is an LPF with a resonant peak at the rolloff point: http://www.geofex.com/Article_Folders/wahpedl/wahped.htm Apparently very easy to do in hardware (2 transistors, couple caps, and an inductor), but I'm not sure where I'd find a LADSPA plugin with this particular frequency response characteristic. Looks like Rakarrack has a wah, and "alien wah" (from Zyn?) and an auto-wah of its own. I'll try those instead. -ken _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user