hollunder@xxxxxx wrote: > This is one of the more annoying properties of arch: if you compile or > package you run into trouble first, often before the developers of > given software. And it's mostly, but not exclusively, gcc trouble. Year, and under ubuntu I had to run 8.04 to get a working system, which wasn't actually performing *that* well. Or I could run debian stable and be compiling anything newer than the often-years-old stuff in the repos by hand. Or gentoo (which I'm too stupid to get up and running, tried twice). Or one of the specialized multi-media distros, which seems to have sporadic development or most documentation available in a language I don't understand :-) Note that this wasn't a rant, just trying to keep up the spirits after about a week with arch, that seems like it's gonna be my new distro of choice. There's no such thing in my world as the perfect distro, and I love making music too much to be an eternal distro-hopper looking for it (the perfect distro). So arch it is for me for now :-) -- Atte http://atte.dk http://modlys.dk http://virb.com/atte _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
