Re: lash status

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Olivier Guilyardi wrote:
> Atte André Jensen wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> I'm building a few apps (seq24, ams, specimen, jackbeat, ardour) from 
>> source. Some of them are lash aware, some not. Which is the current, 
>> recommended version to use, both for compiling the above apps and if one 
>> were to lash'ify some not supporting lash ATM?
>>
>> http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/lash lists the latest release as 
>> 0.5.0 from 2005! That seems a bit old :-)
> 
> There seem to be some fresh tarballs here:
> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/lash.git
> 
> Apparently LASH is in the middle of a rather important refactoring process:
> http://lad.linuxaudio.org/events/2009_cdm/

More precisely:
http://lad.linuxaudio.org/events/2009_cdm/videos/Juuso_Alasuutari_-_LASH_Audio_Session_Handler:Past,_Present_and_Future.ogv

> I'm unsure what I would use for Jackbeat. I suppose I'd use the new API, since
> it's breaking BC, as Juuso Alasuutari mentions it in his talk.

-- 
  Olivier
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux