frank pirrone wrote: > Grammostola Rosea wrote: >> frank pirrone wrote: >> >>> Olivier Guilyardi wrote: >>> >>>> garry.ogle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: >>>> >>>>> frank pirrone wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> I'd also look into Gramofile: >>>>>> for pop/click filtering and automatic breaking of a continuous >>>>>> recording into "tracks" or songs. It can be used for >>>>>> post-processing the recordings you make. >>>>>> I'd also look into Gramofile: >>>>>> >>>>> I'd recommend gnome-wave-cleaner for post-processing: >>>>> >>>>> http://gwc.sourceforge.net/ >>>>> >>>> +1 for Gnome Wave Cleaner. I successfully digitalized 50+ years old >>>> persian >>>> music LP's using this app. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Olivier >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> >>> Yeah, me too. It's a fine program, but my reason for referring the >>> OP to Gramofile was primarily its functionality for breaking a >>> continuous recording into individual tracks or songs based upon the >>> silence between as delimiter. >>> Anyone have another program recommendation for that operation? >>> >>> Of course it's easy enough to manually split a waveform where one >>> tune ends and another begins, but if one were digitizing an entire >>> record collection that would be beyond onerous. Also DAO can >>> certainly handle impressing that continuous recording onto optical >>> media, but that's not the same as having individual files - for any >>> of a number of purposes. >>> >>> >>> >> Thanks all. Interesting suggesting Frank... >> >> Btw. Does it matter for quality what soundcard is used? >> >> > Not in my experience. It's not a demanding audio task. Others may > report differently. Can someone confirm or reject this thesis? \r _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
