On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Grammostola Rosea <rosea.grammostola@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > But for packages which are valuable and do not pass the (license) > criteria of Debian it could be good to have such a repository. For > example for a realtime kernel and stuff like dssi-vst dssi-vst has been plain GPL and perfectly suitable for Debian repositories since version 0.5, released in December 2007, which was the first release to use the vestige headers. > (FST is a candidate for Debian imho) Torben has clearly been doing a better job of marketing than I have, if you knew that FST had become plain GPL but not that dssi-vst already was. Chris _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
