On Mon, 9 Mar 2009 11:04:02 -0400, "Ivica Ico Bukvic" <ico@xxxxxx> wrote: >> Hey Ico, >> >> I'm sorry, but I don't really understand what you mean. While I would >> encourage the people from the Debian Multimedia Team to subscribe to a >> list >> like linux-audio-tuning to discuss tuning issues and grab ideas from >> here, >> I don't see how we could provide mirroring or any kind of services like >> this (we have limited resources), and even if we could, I don't see why >> *we* should do it. >> >> If I understood the original mail correctly, this initiative is meant to >> be >> integrated to *Debian*, and is meant to make the *Debian* distro better, >> because it is *Debian* which has issues with linux-audio. Why should >> linux-audio chime in ? > > Because this is an opportunity to extend distro transparency and ultimately > allow developers to spend more time on developing rather than dealing with > differences between distros. hmm, ok. I'll give you this one. > Besides, we already mirror UbuntuStudio, JACKlab, and 64Studio, so why > shouldn't we also encourage Debian Multimedia to join the consortium and in > turn allow them to use whatever resources we may have. I might have misunderstood something. Is Debian Multimedia a full featured distro like 64studio or UbuntoStudio or an effort to make debian look better regarding audio packages ? My point was : if Debian Multimedia is just an effort to make things better looking on the audio/multimedia side, then it has more to do with the "Debian packages and process" group of people than with the linuxaudio people. Marc-Olivier Barre. ------ Participez au black-out anti-HADOPI : http://www.laquadrature.net/fr/APPEL-HADOPI-blackout-du-net-francais _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
