> Probably I need to make a more nuanced distinction between > linuxaudio.org and linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx It's likely > not true for you running all this stuff but from the outside I see the > two as very intertwined. If the business of linuxaudio.org were to > become a large part of what is discussed on this list, or the list was > to start pushing folks to become Debian based as a policy, then I'd be > disappointed. I think it's best if this list is distro neutral. What > linuxaudio.org does is a different thing. > > AND, I get that you are NOT suggesting ANYTHING about what I'm writing > is true. I'm just asking the question and developing my own point of > view Those are very genuine concerns Mark and I fully agree with you. The lau/lad lists have always been and IMHO should remain distro-agnostic. FWIW, I also see Linuxaudio.org as distro-agnostic. But since Linuxaudio.org's membership is project/company oriented, the only way we can truly become distro-agnostic is by having all relevant distros becoming members and hopefully in a long-run having them collaborate through Linuxaudio.org on establishing standards that would make audio on Linux universal. And although all this sounds way too utopian, it does not hurt to set some noble goals ahead of us and pursue them in hope one day we may reach the end of the rainbow ;-). Best wishes, Ico _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
