Re: Bpm detection/quantize

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 12:10 PM, Fons Adriaensen <fons@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 10:26:25AM +0100, Frank Barknecht wrote:

> Oh, and btw: It's interesting that in this thread there are complains
> when a computer is used to add a beat to music while in another thread
> the addition of reverb to music seems to be no problem at all.

It's two very different things really:

Emulation of natural reverb can be compared to generating
drum or percussion sounds electronically or by software.

Which is quitea different from adding such sounds to music
that doesn't have them, usually for good reasons.


> I know a lot of natural rooms that give a much more beautiful
> reverberation than any digital allpass network can generate. ;)

So do I, and I usually also prefer real percussion over
its synthesised version.

Ciao,


--
FA

Laboratorio di Acustica ed Elettroacustica
Parma, Italia

O tu, che porte, correndo si ?
E guerra e morte !
 
I'll echo Fon's comments about reverb............
 
Alex.

_______________________________________________



--
Parchment Studios (It started as a joke...)
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux