Re: Bpm detection/quantize

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 9:01 AM, Frank Barknecht <fbar@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Beat and rhythm detection also is a hot topic for many years in the
> academic music scene as it's a necessary prerequisite to let a
> computer play along with human performers, ideally in real time.

I actually find this goal more distasteful than the one Fons is objecting to.

I can understand why people are interested in automatic accompaniment,
but mangling human-made music to fit a specific timing map seems like
a more proper goal to me -- "manufactured" being somehow preferable to
"simulated".  (I think this may be an "uncanny valley" situation -- if
you haven't met this term before, look it up.)


Chris
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux