drew Roberts wrote: > On Friday 14 November 2008 02:11:58 Patrick Shirkey wrote: > >> Josh Lawrence wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 1:05 AM, Patrick Shirkey >>> >>> <pshirkey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I'm going to build a webpage for the LAM mix so if anyone has >>>> suggestions for things that should be referenced on it and even ideas >>>> for the layout/theme etc... I'm interested. >>>> >>> http://wiki.creativecommons.org/CcHost >>> >>> I've never used it, but it seems to have all of the functionality you >>> need built right in. >>> >> It has potential but I think it may be too powerful for the first >> version of the site. >> >> I'm not sure the site would need to have any kind of account >> infrastructure. Basically it would just be a reference point for the >> details and location to download the actual mix. >> >> I'm not sure it would be necessary to provide login facilities for >> anyone. I'm not sure if anyone would else would have a need to add >> anything to the site. >> >> I'm open to suggestions though. If other people think they would like to >> make mixes and have them referenced it a central location specific to >> LAM then we could certainly take it in that direction. Although ccmixter >> sort of achieves that goal already just on a broader scale. >> > > ccmixter has issues with allowable licenses. Some linux audio will not be > allowed to be posted unless the makers are willing to relicense. > > They may be a bit aggressive in moving things into the NC domain as well but I > need to do further research on that before I can be sure. > > I have stuff on ccmixter and on kompoz. Both have their plusses. > Ok. So it's possible that we have a niche here that needs to be covered. >> I guess what I'm wondering is if others would like to have a location >> for putting up mixes of LAM tracks or if this site should just be >> focused on the annual mix and leave the more dynamic aspect to the >> existing sites. >> > > > >> Maybe it can start as a single point and if there is demand it can grow >> to encompass other mixes in the future. >> >> Anyway I'll give ccmixter a shot to see if it can be adapted to the >> immediate needs. >> > > Do you mean ccmixter the site or cchost the platform? Yes, cchost is what I meant. > If the latter, please > double check that license options are a config time choice and not hard coded > or, if the latter, that it is easy to mod. > Good point. Will do. -- Patrick Shirkey Boost Hardware Ltd. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
