On Tue, 2008-11-11 at 16:17 +0000, Damon Chaplin wrote: > I'm tempted to have a go at a similar app myself. Maybe you could give > me some advice on what went right with galan and what to avoid. If you value your time, you should better consider to write a gui-builder for Ingen. Among the plus-points of Ingen are - nested patches with sub-patches that are handled very similar to plugin nodes - Polyphony handling making it easy to build polyphonic synth patches. - gui/engine separation. The engine is also meant to be embeddable There might be a way to realise a gui-builder that is both useful for Ingen patches and LV2 plugins. Or you could pick up development of Galan instead of reinventing the wheel. -- Thorsten Wilms thorwil's design for free software: http://thorwil.wordpress.com/ _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
