On Thursday 18 September 2008 12:47 pm, drew Roberts wrote: > Yup, up front. I have always felt that was a bit onerous and perhaps extremely > hard to enforce, For sure! I never looked at it that way--I don't know what they'd be able to do if I started out (in good faith) planning to write something to be GPL'd, but later had the opportunity to dual license and sell it. I guess it would be appropriate to then pay for Qt, but whether they could require anything more than that would be "interesting". > but that is what they require. Randy Kramer -- I didn't have time to write a short letter, so I created a video instead.--with apologies to Cicero, et.al. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
