On Thursday 18 September 2008 11:27 am, drew Roberts wrote: > So, are there any Free programs built around QT that are not GPL? I can't answer that definatively. I know KDE is (being?) ported to Windows, but I guess they manage to do that as free software (i.e., under the GPL license of Qt). It seems to me I've heard of some commercial programs using (or planning to use) Qt, but I can't recite any names. > To do this > legally, one would have to purchase a commercial license right? And then all > contributors would also need commercial licenses right? The mind boggles. Yup, and, iirc, the original terms of Qt's dual license required that you make a decision up front--if you were going to develop a commercial application under the commercial (not GPL) license, you had to decide when you started developing your application, and from that point, pay for Qt. (If that was not for Qt, it was for some other dual licensed library.) Randy Kramer -- I didn't have time to write a short letter, so I created a video instead.--with apologies to Cicero, et.al. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
