On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 11:50:12PM +0300, Nedko Arnaudov wrote: > Fons Adriaensen <fons@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > I'll embrace LASH as soon as its authors bump up the > > version number and convert it to OSC, and allow app > > developers to use this directly instead of passing > > through a library that doesn't fit in at all with the > > architecture of my apps. It's actually *very close* > > to being OSC, the effort required would be minimal. > > > > (posted almost the same a year ago) > > Do you talk about lash 0.5.x or about the new development, 0.6.x that > uses dbus instead of custom protocol (and is not released yet)? Probably 0.5 then. Dbus is not the solution, it's not networked. The first app I'd like to use LASH for uses four networked computers, three of them headless, which is why I want a session manager. Guess I'll have to brew my own then. Ciao, -- FA Laboratorio di Acustica ed Elettroacustica Parma, Italia O tu, che porte, correndo si ? E guerra e morte ! _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
