Fons Adriaensen <fons@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 09:11:33PM +0400, Dmitry Baikov wrote: > >> > As far as I can see, it can just be a Jack app. > >> That's right. Just make sure that LASH is supported by all >> applications, and is user-friendly. > > I'll embrace LASH as soon as its authors bump up the > version number and convert it to OSC, and allow app > developers to use this directly instead of passing > through a library that doesn't fit in at all with the > architecture of my apps. It's actually *very close* > to being OSC, the effort required would be minimal. > > (posted almost the same a year ago) Do you talk about lash 0.5.x or about the new development, 0.6.x that uses dbus instead of custom protocol (and is not released yet)? -- Nedko Arnaudov <GnuPG KeyID: DE1716B0>
Attachment:
pgpIq0OOlEOce.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
