Tim Blechmann wrote: >>> while sharing this experience, i am curious, whether there are any >>> insights, why this is the case? >>> did anyone come up with an analysis of the problem source? maybe >>> bisecting the kernel source? >> I haven't been following the RT list that closely over the last couple >> of weeks, but I think you'll find that version is WAY ahead of the >> stable RT patches. >> >> I got my RT working about 4 weeks ago and was advised by the RT >> developers to go for the latest stable - 2.6.24.7-rt17 > > i am lurking on the linux-rt-users list for a while and i haven't read > any references, why 2.6.26 (patched or unpatched) is not suitable for low- > latency audio ... > > still 2.6.26-rt3 is unusable for me and, as paul mentioned, also for > others ... i'd be curious about the reasons, though ... > is not that .26 is that bad for audio, but *it is* seriously broken for midi. afaict that relates to the -rt only. vanilla might be ok. it has been suggested that the preemptive-BKL changes made after .26-rc2 are the suspect subject. good news are that .27 will have this fixed or at least goes a few steps into an acceptable solution regarding -rt byee -- rncbc aka Rui Nuno Capela rncbc@xxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
