>> while sharing this experience, i am curious, whether there are any >> insights, why this is the case? >> did anyone come up with an analysis of the problem source? maybe >> bisecting the kernel source? > > I haven't been following the RT list that closely over the last couple > of weeks, but I think you'll find that version is WAY ahead of the > stable RT patches. > > I got my RT working about 4 weeks ago and was advised by the RT > developers to go for the latest stable - 2.6.24.7-rt17 i am lurking on the linux-rt-users list for a while and i haven't read any references, why 2.6.26 (patched or unpatched) is not suitable for low- latency audio ... still 2.6.26-rt3 is unusable for me and, as paul mentioned, also for others ... i'd be curious about the reasons, though ... t -- tim@xxxxxxxxxx http://tim.klingt.org Your mind will answer most questions if you learn to relax and wait for the answer. William S. Burroughs _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
