Re: [LAD] First release of jkmeter

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Aug 03, 2008 at 05:38:17PM +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:

> I think the K-14 system might be more to my own taste.

When trying to get an idea of how jkmeter 'reacts',
be careful when using 'canned' music. This evening
I compared two signals:

1. A broadcast from the BBC proms, relayed live on
Italian radio,

2. A piano recital recording which I made some
weeks ago, without any processing or gain
adjustments.

For both I adjusted gains so that the loudest parts
of the music would indicate between 0 and +3dB on 
the jkmeter RMS level, i.e. the 'yellow' range.
This is how you would normally use such a meter.

For 1, the softest parts where at around -10 dB, and
the maximum DPL was -9.4 dB.

For 2, the softest parts where at around -20 dB, and
the maximum DPL was -3.9 dB.

This indicates that 1. was already being processed,
both manually (by the recording engineer gently
boosting softer parts - you'd expect more than 10
dB dynamics for Beethoven's first), and by peak
limiting (again not very intrusive, but essential
for broadcast).

Ciao,

-- 
FA

Laboratorio di Acustica ed Elettroacustica
Parma, Italia

O tu, che porte, correndo si ?
E guerra e morte !



_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux