Ronald Stewart wrote: > the best RT kernel I have used is the good ol' 64studio version cooked by Free. > I can run my entire studio environment with Indamixx opening apps such > as ardour and hydrogen while streaming audio via IDJC over the net on > battery with wifi and editing in audacity... no xruns no dropout in > streaming audio while screen brightness/dims all at the same time. > Likewise I can run idjc with skype and pidgin while doing my audio > edits and production/multitracking in ardour or audacity with no > problems. > 800mhz I gig of RAM > rock solid and pocket sized. > We worked 14months on this build to get it right for those guys out > there who don't want to brew their own. Lastly, we tried RT stuff > from handy heron, ubuntu studio and others and they are not the type > of RT that we offer. I felt great when the off the shelf and home > brew stuff fell way short of a true pro audio low latency experience. > > Thank you > > Ronald Stewart > www.indamixx.com > > On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 6:03 PM, Mark Knecht <markknecht@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 4:12 PM, schoappied <schoappied@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> Mark Knecht wrote: >>> >>>> On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 8:46 AM, schoappied <schoappied@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> <SNIP> >>>> >>>> >>>>> I've read on the debian irc channel that it is not necessary to do a >>>>> rt-patch with the newest kernels (.25.10), just set in menu config: >>>>> >>>>> processor type and features >> preemtible kernel (low -latency desktop) >>>>> >>>>> and Timer frequentie to 1000 Hz. >>>>> >>>>> Can anyone confirm this? >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Not at all true. That strategy will give you a good kernel, but it is >>>> not a 'real-time' kernel. You're best bet is to use the specific patch >>>> set supplied by Ingo and the RT team. >>>> >>>> Hope this helps, >>>> Mark >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> whow, Ive spend I think 20 hours to build a kernel but it constantly >>> fails.... :( :( :( >>> >>> I tried everything with help from IRC and documentation, but different >>> errors... >>> >>> for example: http://pastebin.com/m5bc649d >>> >>> I use a kernel for kernel.org and a rt-patch which fits it... >>> I patch the files as described in this howto: >>> http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?t=17035&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=0 >>> >>> I use: make oldconfig (skip the questions with ENTER) and then make xconfig >>> And set: >>> rocessor type and features> Preemption Mode (Complete Preemption >>> (Real-Time)) >>> Processor type and features>Timer frequency (1000 HZ) >>> >>> Then: >>> $ make-kpkg clean ; export VER=$(date +'%Y%m%d') >>> NAMEEXT="-$(hostname)-$(dpkg-architecture -qDEB_HOST_ARCH)"; make-kpkg >>> --revision=$VER --append-to-version=$NAMEEXT --rootcmd fakeroot --initrd >>> kernel_image kernel_headers >>> >>> Can it fails because of the new kernel versions I try to build? >>> Or do I make errors in making the .config file? >>> >> I'm not at all clear what this previous command does. the normal set >> of build instructions at this point is very simple >> >> make && make modules_install >> >> Even if that isn't the 'Debian' way, is it possible to build and >> install a kernel as the kernel designers intended it or does that not >> work on Debian? >> >> Maybe there's another Debian user here who can help you. I'm Gentoo >> based and it's pretty straight forward here. >> >> - Mark >> _______________________________________________ >> Linux-audio-user mailing list >> Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user >> >> > > Where can I find the 64studio kernel and headers? _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
