Reuben Martin wrote: > Back on Friday 04 July 2008, Mark Knecht was like: > >> The question is whether rt-sources, as built from portage using the >> overlay, is based on the vanilla kernel or based on gentoo-sources. I >> believe it's built on the vanilla kernel or else we'd be picking which >> version of the Gentoo kernel we want to add the patch set to. That's >> not what the pro-audio overlay does. It's just patching >> vanilla-sources. (If I'm wrong about this let me know but that's the >> way it started.) >> >> > > You can apply the rt patchset against both the vanilla or gentoo-sources. > There is very little difference between the gentoo-sources and the vanilla > kernel. The only thing added to gentoo-sources are patches to fix things on > specific architectures (usually solaris) and a couple small insignificant > drivers. That's it. > > I personally apply the rt patch set against the gentoo sources. Have for quite > a while. No problems. (You will get two errors when applying the patchset. > Both are trivial crap that doesn't matter. One for a set of brackets which > aren't needed anyway where the framebuffer driver is added on, and another > when it tries to change the name of the kernel which you can change yourself > in the config menu if you want.) > > -Reuben > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-audio-user mailing list > Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user > > I've read on the debian irc channel that it is not necessary to do a rt-patch with the newest kernels (.25.10), just set in menu config: processor type and features >> preemtible kernel (low -latency desktop) and Timer frequentie to 1000 Hz. Can anyone confirm this? _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
