Am Montag, 23. Juni 2008 schrieb Svend-Erik Kjær Madsen: > What would you bee using if you should record a large music file in > let's say 14-16 tracks ? Next month my band have a live-gig I want to > record, and I am on the brink of letting my old and heavy ADAT tape > machines be left back, and only bring my notebook and my multiface amd > my mic-preamps for recording. > Is it stable and secure to record in Ardour in one go ? Either ardour if you want a complicated interface for a simple task. Or timemachine if you want a simple interface for a simple task. timemachine even records backwards in time so when you decide to record each song on its own, you can press the record-button after the song started and it will (with respect to the length you told it to buffer) record the beginning if the song too. > I could raise > latency since we're not using any kind of live monitoring from the > computer. 2x1024 should be good for plain recording (even if you do recording-while-playing). The higher the latency the better the chance for the disks to keep up. Only if you really need software monitoring or are playing and recording softsynths you need low-latency. But test your setup before the gig. Or maybe bring your ADAT _and_ your multiface and record with both if its an important recording. Have fun, Arnold -- visit http://www.arnoldarts.de/ --- Hi, I am a .signature virus. Please copy me into your ~/.signature and send me to all your contacts. After a month or so log in as root and do a "rm -rf /". Or ask your administrator to do so...
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
